Search results

That’s a good point. Policies like this tend to work better when they come from student/community input rather than top-down decisions.

^^ that’s what I was thinking. Make alternatives, don’t force changes on everyone.

The cycle is intentional though. Companies rely on consistent upgrades to maintain revenue. If people only upgraded every 4–5 years, profits would drop hard.

Exactly Tara. That’s the type of thing I was thinking about when I first mentioned this. If a device is physically fine but becomes unusable because support disappears, that’s basically indirect obsolescence.

Hey Cristian, appreciate the credit and thanks for writing this up. I didn’t expect my earlier comment to inspire a full post, but I’m glad it did because this is actually a really interesting topic. Planned obsolescence is something people run into all the time without necessarily thinking...

Exactly, to save a couple bucks we're sending our money to another country and in turn they're giving us garbage that we will need to replace sooner than if we just bought the quality stuff made in Canada or the US in the first place.

We need stuff like this in localized areas, because there are big organizations but they tend to forget cities and city green space and instead focus on large scale parks

Why is it that some of the stuff we use every single day still feels like it was invented by someone who never actually tried to use it? Like… who decided that scissors should be painful for lefties, or that headphone cords should explode after two weeks? Take chargers, for example. You’d think...

Lol, I swear the worst is when you’re late for something and you gotta weave through like 10 scooters just to get to the street. Stressful.

Lol, imagine being rich enough to lobby the law so you pay less than the janitor down the street. Ethics be out the window.

Exactly. You think you’re “saving” them but sometimes you’re just making more work for wildlife officers. Let the pros handle it.

People always think they can handle “nature” in a cage. Like… nature doesn’t negotiate. You don’t get a raccoon to chill just ‘cause you want it to

I’d add that culture matters too. In environments where corruption is normalized or rewarded, it’s harder for someone to resist. In a culture that values integrity, even people with a lot of power might feel more pressure to act ethically.

I think one key factor is accountability and community. Power doesn’t exist in a vacuum. If someone has influence but is surrounded by people who challenge bad decisions and demand fairness, they’re much less likely to become corrupt.

Statistically speaking, Canada still has a multi-party parliamentary system with several parties represented in government. However, public discourse can sometimes simplify the landscape into two dominant narratives, which can give the impression of a binary political divide.

That’s an interesting point. Many legal systems have tried to modernize jury procedures, but the fundamental goal has remained the same: ensuring that legal decisions are influenced by the perspective of ordinary citizens rather than only legal professionals.

Historically, mandatory jury duty was designed to protect fairness in the justice system by involving ordinary citizens. The challenge is balancing that goal with the reality that modern work and personal obligations can make participation difficult.

It’s a tricky balance. Some level of wealth can incentivize innovation and risk-taking, but extreme concentration creates social and economic problems. The real question might be how to allow success without letting it create such an enormous gap between a few people and everyone else.

Historically, every major technological shift has increased the pace of life in some way. The difference today is the scale and speed of digital communication. Society may still be adjusting to that change

Another question is whether we’re thinking about this from the perspective of the future child. If someone has the chance to be born without a serious inherited disease, many people would probably say that’s a good thing. The ethical challenge is balancing that benefit with the risks and the...

Agreed. If we expect students to graduate ready for adulthood, this is one of the most essential skills that shouldn’t be optional.

High school is supposed to prepare students for adulthood, and managing money is a big part of that. If students graduate without this knowledge, it feels like a serious gap in education.

Most societies are built on the idea that laws exist to keep order, protect people, and create fairness. In theory, if everyone follows the law, society functions better. But history also shows that some laws have been unjust, and sometimes the people who challenged or broke them are later seen...

Another thing, some people might argue that sanctuaries or rescue centers are the only ethical way to keep exotic pets. Even then, they usually focus on education or conservation rather than private enjoyment.

Also, remote work plays into this. If teams can collaborate digitally, compressing the workweek is easier. But for in-person roles or client-facing positions, there’s a lot more friction.

Another factor might be how fast skills change now. In certain industries, switching companies can expose workers to new tools, technologies, or management styles that they might never experience if they stayed in one place too long.

I think this post highlights a big issue in the gun debate that doesn’t get talked about enough. The term “assault weapon” is used constantly in media and politics, but very few people actually understand what it means. Like the post says, it isn’t really a technical firearms classification...

Yeah, hybrid makes sense in theory, but it’s super hard to manage. Some managers just don’t get it, they expect you to be “always available” at home, which kills the whole flexibility idea.

Honestly, I think remote work is kinda overrated. Sure, no commute is nice, but people forget about the isolation. Zoom fatigue is real, and some employees basically just disappear, no one knows if they’re actually working or bingeing Netflix. Productivity might look fine on paper, but is it...

Well the internet seem unavoidable atp so we should at least try to do something about it since it is going to be around for a long time

Advertising has evolved a lot from simple billboards and TV commercials. Today, companies use behavioral psychology, targeted ads, and large amounts of user data to influence what people buy and when they buy it. In theory, this just helps businesses reach people who are more likely to be...

Most of the current discussion focuses on whether Canada should publicly back the U.S. and Israel militarily, but what about humanitarian support? Canada could emphasize sending aid, medical supplies, and refugee assistance rather than just taking a stance on strikes. Could prioritizing...

I can second this, I think it doesn't matter the motive as long as they're doing good for the community. We need some way to motivate people.